Pentagon Officials Lloyd Austin & Mark Milley Press Conference Transcript: Afghanistan Update

Speaker 1: (00:00)
So right over to the secretary for opening comments, I will be moderating. Please limit followups if you can, Mr. Secretary.

Secretary Austin: (00:07)
Thanks John.

I’m going to speak briefly and then turn it over to the chairman for an operational update. Let me start by saying that we remain laser focused right now on Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul and on doing everything that we can to continue evacuating Americans, allies, Afghans, who’ve worked alongside us and also other courageous Afghans at special risk. And to that end, I’m prioritizing three key concerns.

First, the safety and security of our people and the people that we’re trying to evacuate. As the chairman will brief you, the final elements of additional military forces continued to flow in the Kabul with about 4,500 in place as we speak. They are trained and equipped to defend themselves and their operations. There have been no hostile interactions with the Taliban and our lines of communication with Taliban commanders remain open as they should be.

My second focus is maintaining security at the airport itself. In concert with forces from our allies, our troops have set up defensive positions around the airport and the airport is able to function safely. Now we don’t take this for granted and I continue to be in daily contact with General McKenzie and commanders on the ground to make sure that they have what they need to keep it safe.

My third area of focus, of course, is the pace. Increasing the flow of aircraft and people out of Kabul. And we’ve flown out several thousand since the 15th of August and our goal is to be able to increase our capacity every day going forward. And as we build out this capacity, we’re working hand in glove with the state department which is leading the whole of government effort to notify and process American citizens who are leaving, and to urgently identify and process Afghan applicants as well.

We’ve dispatched small military teams to two of the airports gates to assist the state department console their efforts as they evaluate and process individuals seeking entry. And we expect to be able to augment that capability in the coming days. This is truly a team effort across the inner agency and throughout all of this, our US service members are making exceptional efforts under challenging circumstances, and showing their humanity and their compassion. So I want to thank them for their skill and their professionalism. It’s not lost on me that even as we conduct this very important mission, we also continue to help our fellow Americans deal with a new surge in the pandemic and the citizens of Haiti deal with the aftermath of an earthquake. Let me also thank General McKenzie and Rear Admiral Vasely who is a commander of US forces forward and Major General Donahue of the 82nd Airborne Division and Brigadier General Sullivan for their leadership at this critical time, it is making an enormous difference. They know, as I do that, there’s a lot of work to be done yet.

Now, all of this is very personal for me. This is a war that I fought in and led. I know the country, I know the people, and I know those who fought alongside me. As I said, we have a moral obligation to help those who helped us and I feel the urgency deeply. So I want to end with a word for the force and our military. I know that these are difficult days for those who lost loved ones in Afghanistan and for those who carry the wounds of war. Especially now, we mourn those who made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan, let me say to their families and loved ones, our hearts are with you. And the US military stands as one to honor. Those we’ve lost.

Now, Afghan war veterans aren’t some monolith, I’m hearing strong views from all sides on this issue and that’s probably the way that it should be. What’s important is that each of us will work our way through this in our own way. We need to respect that and we need to give one another the time and space to help do it. Our greatest asset as a nation is the extraordinary men and women who volunteer to keep us all safe and their families. We honor your service, we understand your sacrifice and we will never forget it. And so with that, I’m going to turn it over to General Milley who can talk about where we stand operationally.

General Milley: (05:36)
Good afternoon everyone and thank you Mr. Secretary.

What I’d like to do is give you an overall situation update as a today and what our next steps are. Currently, the United States military has focused on the specific mission of conducting a noncombatant evacuation operation from Afghanistan. This is likely to be probably the second largest NEO conducted by the United States. Our key tasks are to establish and maintain security at the Kabul international airport, defend the airport from attack, evacuate all American citizens from Afghanistan who desire to leave this country, evacuate any third country nationals or allies and partners as designated by the secretary of state, evacuate personnel with state department designated special immigrant visas and evacuate any other evacuees that the state department designates.

The President of the United States made a decision to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan on April 14th. Since that date, we conducted a deliberate and responsible draw-down of US forces to less than a thousand with a specific task of securing the US embassy and our diplomatic presence in Afghanistan. Since then the security situation rapidly degraded. Today, the situation is still very dangerous, very dynamic, and very fluid. And all of us can be proud of the soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines who are executing this mission. They are currently in harms way, that needs to be our focus. There’ll be plenty of time to do AAR’s but right now, our mission is to secure that airfield, defend that airfield and evacuate all those who have been faithful to us. There’ll be many post-mortems on this topic, but right now is not that time. Right now there are troops at risk and we are the United States military and we fully intend to successfully evacuate all American citizens who want to get out of Afghanistan. All American citizens who want to get out of Afghanistan, they are priority number one. In addition, we intend to evacuate those have been supporting us for years, and we’re not going to leave them behind and we will get out as many as possible.

Our troops in Kabul are taking high risks to accomplish that mission. Every minute, these troops are on the ground, making difficult decisions with incredible skill, incredible bravery and incredible valor. Currently the security situation at the airport is stable, however, there are threats and we’re closely monitoring those, at any moment they could happen. We can identify them. If we identify them, we will take immediate military action without hesitation, and according to the rules of engagement. The Taliban and every other organization that country knows it. The Taliban are in and around Kabul right now, but they are not interfering with our operations. Through the state department the Taliban are facilitating the safe passage to the airport for American citizens, that is US passport holders. We also have a risk as you saw the other day of unarmed innocent civilians massing on the airfield-

… unarmed innocent civilians massing on the airfield where it became a safety hazard to our airplanes, our air crews, and also to themselves. And we currently have that situation under control inside the airfield. There’s many other risks out there and the troops are dealing with those every single day in this volatile environment, which can and likely will change rapidly.

Let me make one comment on the intelligence because I’m seeing all over the news that there were warnings of a rapid collapse. I have previously said from this podium and in sworn testimony before Congress that the intelligence clearly indicated multiple scenarios were possible. One of those was an outright Taliban takeover following a rapid collapse of the Afghan security forces and the government. Another was a civil war and a third was a negotiated settlement.

However, the timeframe of rapid collapse that was widely estimated and ranged from weeks to months and even years following our departure, there was nothing that I or anyone else saw that indicated a collapse of this army and this government in 11 days. Central command submitted a variety of plans that were briefed and approved by the joint chiefs of staff, the secretary of defense and the president. These plans were coordinated, synchronized and rehearsed to deal with these various scenarios.

One of those contingencies is what we are executing right now. As I said before, there’s plenty of time to do AARs and key lessons learned and to delve into these questions with great detail, but right now is not that time. Right now, we have to focus on this mission because we have soldiers at risk. And we also have American citizens and Afghans who supported us for 20 years also at risk. This is personal and we’re going to get them out. And we in uniform have a deep commitment to this mission.

Now, let me give you an operational update. The security situation, as I said, is currently secure at this time. And since 12 hours we’ve deployed 12, or correction, two, United States Marine battalions, one battalion from the Minnesota National Guard. All three of those were pre-positioned in theater, CENTCOM AOR as part of the contingency planning. In addition to that, we alerted, marshaled, and deployed the 82nd Airborne Division headquarters and a brigade of the 82nd Airborne Division consisting of three airborne infantry battalions, and associated enablers.

And finally, there was an infantry battalion from the 10th Mountain Division securing the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. In addition, we were operating on the ground with a variety of special operations forces. That in combination with the ground forces, we have some of the best soldiers and Marines the world has ever seen. In total, there are 20 U.S. maneuver companies currently on the ground with about 4,500 troops and the flow continues.

The president has authorized, as you all know, up to 6,000. On top of them is the United States Navy and Air Force. We have multiple squadrons of F-18s, AV-8s, F-16s, AC-130s, B-52s and MQ-9s. We have a significant amount of rotary wing aviation on the ground, including attack and lift helicopters. In addition, we are working with our allies and partners. There are British infantry rifle companies along with British special forces on the ground working with us. It was also a Turkish security force and there are other international special operations forces.

This force is capable of extracting a significant amount of people on U.S. Air Force aircraft. Right now we’re averaging about 20 sorties of C-17s every 24 hours. We have the capability to significantly increase that throughput as the Department of State makes evacuees available. As the secretary said, we’ve already evacuated approximately 5,000 people and we intend to increase it.

In addition to the military airflow, there’s a variety of commercial and charter flights taking out evacuees on behalf of various other countries and NGOs. The military side of the airfield is open and the civilian side of the airfield is also open. And we intend to keep them both open for military, commercial and charter flights. One caveat on the civilian side, however, is that the airframes have to come in by visual flight rules only and a NOTAM is going out to all the air crews.

The state department is working to rapidly increase the flow of passengers available to get out on the aircraft and we are fully supporting them with our military personnel at the entrance gates. In this highly dynamic environment, there’s a number of unexpected challenges that can and likely will continue to occur. And we rely heavily on the talent, skill and training of our troops. We’ve got great people across all the ranks and services out there right now on this mission.

In addition to Afghanistan, which is clearly our main effort, we’re also conducting humanitarian and assistant operations in Haiti in the aftermath of a 7.2 magnitude earthquake with a significant loss of life. On the West Coast, we’re fighting wildfires and we continue to conduct COVID support and other operations around the world. As we reflect on these difficult and challenging times, every soldier, sailor, airman, Marine, coast guardsman, who was fought or conducted operation in Afghanistan, almost 800,000 should hold their head high.

For more than 20 years, we have prevented an attack on the U.S. Homeland. 2, 448 lost their lives. 20,722 were wounded in action. And many others suffered the unseen wounds of war. To each of them, I want you to know personally that your service mattered. As the secretary said, for both he and I this is personal and I know it’s personal for each and every one of you. Thank you.

John: (15:29)
Okay, we’ll go to questions. Bob.

Bob: (15:31)
Thank you, John. I have a question for you each of you gentlemen, if I may. Mr. Secretary, you mentioned the urgency of ramping up the pace of the evacuation. So you have a safe passage agreement with the Taliban. But in fact, in some cases, American citizens, Afghans who are at risk who are being advised to go to the airport are able to get into the airport because of Taliban checkpoints and so forth. So are you considering other ways that you can get around that problem, by for example, sending forces out beyond the airport to collect people and bring them, escort them into to the airport?

Bob: (16:10)
If I may ask General Milley. With a rapid collapse of the Afghan forces, there’s large amounts of weaponry that are kind of out there now that were either surrendered or abandoned by the Afghan forces that are otherwise captured by the Taliban. Are you considering ways that you might destroy some of that equipment to avoid it falling into the Taliban’s hands?

Thanks, Bob. In terms of whether or not we intend to send forces outside of the airfield to collect up American citizens or Afghans who are special immigrant visa applicants, the forces that we have are focused on security of the airfield. And you know how important that is and you know what happens if we lose the ability to provide that security. And so I don’t want to detract from that. And we have to make sure that we can not only secure the airfield, but as the chairman said, defend it as well because there are a number of threats still in the environment.

I certainly don’t want to do anything to make the airfield less safe and we won’t do that. But we will continue to coordinate and deconflict with the Taliban. And make sure that those folks, those people that need to get to the airfield have the right credentials to ensure passage. And the Taliban has been checking those credentials and if they have them, they have allowed them to pass so.

On the equipment part, we obviously have capabilities, but I’d prefer not to discuss any-

We obviously have capabilities, but I’d prefer not to discuss any operations other than what we’re doing right now in order to get our evacuation out and get that complete. And then there’ll be another time when we can discuss future operations.

Speaker 2: (18:13)
Barb.

Barb: (18:13)
I would like to press both of you on the same points. General Milley, you say in your statement that one of your tasks is to evacuate all American citizens from Afghanistan who desire to leave. There are Americans clearly all over Kabul. There may be Americans in other parts of the country. How can the US, the Pentagon live up to that task of evacuating all Americans because we continue to see the violence just outside the airport and how would you get them around the country, unless you go get them?

Well, two things, Barbara. One is State Department as you know, as I said is working with the Taliban to facilitate safe passage of American citizens, US passport holders to the airport. And that’s the primary means and under the current conditions, that’s the primary effort. We have capability to do other things if necessary.

Barb: (19:12)
Well, can I ask you what that means? Because you also said there were international special forces there that have the capability to extract, and those words suggest very clearly in the military realm, you would go get people.

Well, that’d be a policy decision. And if directed, we have capabilities that can execute whatever we’re directed.

Barb: (19:32)
Thank you.

Speaker 2: (19:32)
Louie.

And I would draw a distinction, Barb, between extracting someone in an extremist condition or circumstance versus going out and collecting up large numbers of American citizens.

Barb: (19:50)
Do you have the capability to go out and collect Americans?

We don’t have the capability to go out and collect up large numbers of people, Barb.

Speaker 2: (20:00)
Louie, go ahead.

Louie: (20:01)
For both of you if I could. You have 5,000 US military personnel on the ground securing the area. You have small groups, potentially, of Taliban fighters outside there who are holding up potentially the second-largest NEO that could be undertaken. You have the capability to get there, but how do you get those people inside so that they can actually get on those planes? And both of you have served in major command roles inside Afghanistan, did you not see the possibility that the Afghan security forces were not up to this fight?

We continue to work with the State Department officials on the ground to improve the procedures at the entry points to make sure that we can speed up the process of getting people in and move them onward. And so State is deploying more consular officers to be able to help with that. As I stated earlier, we’re going to push more military assistance down to the entry points to facilitate these efforts, but we’re really working hard to get as many people through as possible. And quite frankly, it’s obvious we’re not close to where we want to be in terms of getting the numbers through. So we’re going to work that 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and we’re going to get everyone that we can possibly evacuate evacuated. And I’ll do that as long as we possibly can until the clock runs out or we run out of capability.

Louie: (21:46)
Thank you, sir. And also about the Afghan security forces, did you feel that they were ever up to this fight, or did you not see this coming, that they were not up to the fight?

Well, I stood behind this podium and said that the Afghan security forces had the capacity. And by that, I mean, they had the training, the size, the capability to defend their country. This comes down to an issue of will and leadership. And no, I did not nor did anyone else see a collapse of an army that size in 11 days?

Speaker 2: (22:18)
[Fabrice 00:22:18].

Louie: (22:18)
Thank you.

Fabrice: (22:19)
August 31st is the end date. At what point does the military need to start thinking about and carrying out its own retrograde to meet that deadline? And secondly, do you believe or do you regret not starting the evacuation a bit earlier or even by a day or two to sort of get ahead of the curve?

So, that’s a great question. At what point do we start thinking about having to retrograde our own capabilities? That’s actually the point before we put them in there. We know that we got to have the right mix of capabilities on the ground. We don’t want to put excessive materials on the ground that are not relevant to what we’re doing. And we have to develop a detailed plan to retrograde our equipment and our people, and synchronize that plan with our efforts to get as many people out as fast as we can with the time that we have available. So that work is something that we started thinking about very early on and that’s something that we’ll continue to think about and develop detailed plans for.

Fabrice: (23:28)
Are you regretting not starting the evacuation even a few days earlier?

Speaker 2: (23:34)
Who’s that for, Fabrice?

Fabrice: (23:35)
Either one.

We make plans for a number of things and clearly as the chairman pointed out, as we did detailed planning throughout, we recognize that there might be a point in time when would we’d have to conduct a NEO. So we positioned all the right forces in theater to be able to do that. We put forces on standby in the United States to support that. And of course, we’re in support of the State-led SIV applicant process throughout. So in terms of doing everything that we could at the right time, I think we have been pretty prudent in terms of thinking ahead and planning for contingencies. And we’re executing one of those plans right now.

Speaker 2: (24:35)
Helene.

Helene: (24:37)
This question is for both of you, and I’d like for both of you to answer. I know we keep harping on the same thing, but it feels like the video is not matching the audio right now. It seems to me barring a lobotomy by the Taliban, you have three pathways ahead of you. One, you can expand the perimeter and establish a corridor into Kabul to get our Afghan allies out. Two, you could extend the August 31st deadline of withdrawing, or three, you can just leave the tens of thousands of Afghans who’ve helped us over the past 20 years behind. Which one is it going to be?

Well, first of all, as I said, Helene, we’re going to evacuate everybody that we can physically possibly evacuate. And we’ll conduct this process for as long as we possibly can. We will continue to deconflict issues with the Taliban and we will stay focused on securing the airfield. We cannot afford to either not defend that airfield or not have an airfield that’s secure, where we have hundreds or thousands of civilians that can access the airfield at will and put our forces at risk.

Helene: (26:02)
But that doesn’t answer the question. I mean, you’re still saying you’re focused on the airfield. These people can’t get into the airfield.

Well, we’re going to do everything we can to continue to try to deconflict and create passageways for them to get to the airfield. I don’t have the capability to go out and extend operations currently into Kabul. And where do you take that? I mean, how far can you extend into Kabul, and how long does it take the flow of those forces in to be able to do that?

Helene: (26:37)
So it sounds like you’re saying this depends on diplomacy with the Taliban, that’s it, that’s our only option is getting them to agree to do this.

Well, let me add something here, Helene. We’ve got a couple of entry control points set up, a north one, an east one, and a third on at Abby Gate. They’re currently manned with consular officers, Marines. This is all part of the perimeter. The-

… with Consular Officers, Marines. This all part of the perimeter. Messages have gone out by various means of communication from the State Department to American citizens and others and they’re being told to go to those gates. Right now, we’re processing at about, I think the last report was about 120, 130 an hour or something like that at the north, and about 340, 350 an hour or something like that at the south gate. So right now, there’s a steady flow of people. Now, as that goes on, I think those numbers will continue to grow as those messages go out and I would tell you that, for the American citizens, passport holders, the Taliban and the State Department are working on, I got it, but they’re working on a facilitation measure. So those numbers are likely to grow. For the others, the State Department is still working through exactly getting the procedures for the evacuees to get to the airfield.

Speaker 3: (27:56)
Okay. Jen.

Jen: (27:57)
Defense Secretary Austin, how many U.S. taxpayer funded military aircraft have been flown out of the country? And what are you doing to get those back? We’ve heard of Afghan pilots taking those planes to third countries. And General Milley, you talk about the intelligence reports and you said there wasn’t anything suggesting 11 days that Kabul would fall, but you do mention there were some reports suggesting it could fall apart in weeks. If so, why did you abandon the Bagram Airfield? Why didn’t U.S. military pull-out given the uncertainty?

Yeah. Go ahead.

Jen, in terms of the aircraft that have been flown out that you had mentioned earlier, I have received reports of a number of aircraft that were flown into Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Exactly how many, I don’t have numbers on. In terms of what we’re doing about them currently, right now, Jen, we’re focused on the airfield and getting people out safely. And so we’re going to take that issue up at a later date, and we’re going to continue to try to gain greater familiarity on the issue as well.

And then on your question on Bagram, securing Bagram, you know how big Bagram is. You’ve been there many times. Securing Bagram is a significant level of military effort and forces, and it would also require external support from the Afghan security forces. Our task was to protect the Embassy in order for the Embassy personnel to continue to function with the consular service and all that. If we were to keep both Bagram and the Embassy going, that would be a significant number of military forces that would have exceeded what we had or stayed the same or exceeded what we had. So we had to collapse one or the other, and a decision was made, the proposal was made from CENTCOM Command and the commander on the ground, Scott Miller, to go ahead and collapse Bagram.

That was all briefed and approved, and we estimated that the risk of going out of [KAIA 00:29:59] and the risk going out of Bagram about the same. So going out of KAIA was estimated to be the better tactical solution in accordance with the mission set that we were given and in accordance with getting the troops down to about a 600, 700 number.

Speaker 3: (30:14)
Okay, we’ve got time for two more. And I haven’t gotten to the phones at all so we’ll go to Dan Lamothe from the Washington Post.

Dan Lamothe: (30:22)
Thank you. General, just to follow up on the Bagram versus HKAIA question. HKAIA has a single runway, with the commercial airport making it much more difficult to defend that runway. We’ve already seen that this week. Bagram has two runways. It would have been a lot easier to protect people once inside. Is there any thought of retaking Bagram in order to expedite this evacuation? And if not, why not?

Good question. Great question. But I’m not going to discuss branches and sequels off of our current operation. I’ll just leave it at that.

Speaker 3: (31:00)
Okay. And I think the last one for today will go to you, [Court 00:31:03].

Court: (31:04)
General Milley, you keep saying that no one expected a collapse of the Afghan government and military in 11 days, but the reality is the Taliban offensive began weeks ago. They were threatening Kandahar a month ago already. So the question is, if you both think you had such a moral obligation to these Afghans who supported the military and State Department for 20 years, should you have pushed harder when the Taliban offensive began to get these people out and then they may not be in this situation that they’re in right now? And then also, if there is this U.S. military-Taliban de-confliction process that’s going on right now, have you been asking them to allow the Afghans through and has the Taliban denied that request? Is that why there’s not some effort? The Embassy put out a statement today saying that the U.S. couldn’t provide any safe passage for these Afghans. Is that because the Taliban won’t allow that in this de- confliction?

It’s a very dynamic environment as you would imagine, and, of course, there have been things that have occurred that we do hear reports of people getting turned away by checkpoints. We’ve gone back and reinforced to the Taliban that if they have credentials, they need to be allowed through. And so that’s working better than it was. And, quite frankly, the major issue right now is processing the people who are there as fast as we possibly can. It’s not a dearth of people getting there, it’s just being able to move the folks that are there through so that we can get them on aircraft. But there have been some unfortunate incidents that I’ve learned about and we continue to work to try to de-conflict and make sure that there is safe passage for the people that are trying to get to the airport.

Court: (33:07)
Have you asked the Taliban or has the military asked the Taliban to allow these Afghans through and they’ve declined?

We continue to work on it. Yes, we have. We have gone back and emphasized that people who are trying to get to the airport and have the right credentials need to be allowed through.

Court: (33:24)
Because right now the airport represents safety to a lot of these people. As the Taliban are in Kabul, they’re worried that the longer they wait to get there, it is a secure airport, even if it means they wait there several days to get on a flight. So that’s why there’s this frenetic-ism to get them through. And then also, if you could also just the question of, should you have pushed harder when it was clear that this Taliban offensive was gaining momentum a month ago down towards Kandahar and other places?

Well, like I said up front, there’s going to be plenty of time for ARs. Right now, we’re focused on the mission, focused on these people getting out, American citizens, the SIVs and other Afghans at risk. And there’s going to be plenty of time to talk about regrets and pushed harder and all these other kinds, Intel assessments, et cetera. Plenty of time to do ARs. Right now is not that time.

Speaker 3: (34:08)
Thanks, guys. We’re going to have to go. Appreciate your time. Thank you so much.

Pentagon Officials Lloyd Austin & Mark Milley Press Conference Transcript: Afghanistan Update

Other Related Transcripts

Stay updated.