Faster Witness Impeachment With Speech Technology

Faster Witness Impeachment With Speech Technology

Discover how criminal defense attorneys use Rev's speech technology to identify contradictions in witness testimony in real time.

Written by:
Rev Press
May 9, 2025
A woman testifies in a courtroom, speaking into a microphone, while a judge listens attentively in the background
Table of contents
Hungry For More?

Luckily for you, we deliver. Subscribe to our blog today.

Thank You for Subscribing!

A confirmation email is on it’s way to your inbox.

Share this post
The LinkedIn logo in black.
The Facebook logo in black.
X logo
The Pinterest logo in black.
A icon of a piece of mail in black.

Criminal defense attorneys face a formidable challenge when preparing for cross-examination: discovering inconsistencies in witness testimony across hours of recorded interviews, written statements, and pretrial testimony

Traditionally, this process has been painstaking, requiring attorneys and paralegals to manually transcribe recordings, organize notes, and hope they can quickly locate contradictions during trial. When a witness says something unexpected on the stand, time becomes the enemy as defense teams scramble to find prior inconsistent statements.

This landscape is changing dramatically thanks to advances in speech technology. Tools that transcribe, organize, and make searchable every word of testimony are transforming how criminal defense attorneys prepare for and execute cross-examinations. 

The Cross-Examination Challenge

Effective cross-examination often hinges on identifying inconsistencies in testimony. When witnesses contradict their previous statements, these contradictions can be powerful tools for impeachment, potentially undermining the credibility of prosecution witnesses and strengthening the defense's case.

Traditionally, preparing for cross-examination has involved:

  • Manual transcription of recordings by paralegals or administrative staff
  • Extensive note-taking during preliminary hearings and depositions
  • Hours spent reviewing audio and video evidence
  • Creating physical filing systems to organize statements by topic or witness
  • Developing mechanisms to quickly access relevant statements during trial

These methods are not only time-consuming but inherently limited. During the pressure of a trial, attorneys may struggle to quickly locate specific statements buried in hours of recordings or hundreds of pages of notes. The consequences of missing contradictions can be severe, potentially allowing damaging testimony to stand unchallenged and influencing the jury's perception of the case.

Swingle Levin Case Study: A Game-Changing Approach

Swingle Levin LLC specializes exclusively in criminal defense, with particular expertise in handling complex felony charges and high-stakes cases. Their attorneys bring decades of combined experience to each case, focusing on thorough investigation and strategic defense preparation.

Attorney Adam Levin faced a challenging criminal defense case involving multiple law enforcement interviews that needed processing and analysis. The case presented two distinct phases with different requirements:

Pre-Trial Preparation:

  • Multiple recorded law enforcement interviews needed processing
  • Creating accessible, searchable records of all testimony was essential
  • Developing effective cross-examination strategies required a comprehensive analysis
  • Identifying potential inconsistencies across multiple interviews was critical

In-Trial Execution:

  • Responding to unexpected testimony in real-time
  • Quickly locating contradictory statements during witness testimony
  • Presenting inconsistent statements effectively during cross-examination
  • Impeaching witnesses with their previous statements without delay

Levin turned to Rev to transform their approach to both phases. The team uploaded several hours of law enforcement interviews to Rev, which produced highly accurate transcripts. These transcripts, combined with other case materials, gave Levin a comprehensive database of searchable testimony that became the foundation of their cross-examination strategy.

But the real game-changer came during trial. As Levin explains:

"We had many recorded law enforcement interviews. We uploaded those into Rev, which produced really good transcripts. I used those transcripts along with other written materials to have a rough idea of what I wanted to cross-examine witnesses about. That would've made Rev worth the price of admission in my book. But then during the trial, several witnesses provided testimony that was unexpected and wildly different than what they'd said in their recorded interviews. While the witnesses were testifying I was able to easily use Rev to verify that they had never spoken of these observations before or if they had to show how it was different."

Levin leveraged Rev's search function and AI chat capabilities to instantly verify contradictions across multiple transcripts. When his turn for cross-examination came, he could immediately play the inconsistent statements directly to witnesses while they were on the stand.

"I was able to do so by using both the search function and AI chat with Rev for the various transcripts related to those witnesses. Then when it was my turn to cross these witnesses, I was able to use my laptop to quickly play their inconsistent statements to them while the witness was on the stand. If you already know the sections of audio you 100% will use in cross, you can do this. But I'm not aware of any way to do this in real time like I did."

The Results: Powerful Real-Time Impeachment

The impact of this technology-enhanced approach was dramatic. Swingle Levin experienced multiple concrete benefits:

  • Time Savings: "I think Rev probably saved me 20 to 30 hours of prep time. But it also saved my paralegals a lot of time as well. That would be harder for me to quantify as I'm not sure how long they would've spent on those transcripts," said Levin.
  • Comprehensive Preparation: The team created a searchable testimony database that enabled more thorough strategy development and case analysis.
  • Courtroom Advantage: Most critically, Rev enabled immediate identification and presentation of inconsistent testimony during cross-examination.
  • Multiplier Effect: As Levin notes, "The usefulness in trial was more of a multiplayer rather than a time saver." The technology didn't just save time—it created capabilities that would have been practically impossible with traditional methods.

The result was a successful witness impeachment that significantly strengthened their defense case.

Speech Tech Features For Effective Witness Impeachment

Several specific technological capabilities made this transformation possible. Unlike traditional methods that rely on manual notes and memory recall, modern speech technology provides a comprehensive toolkit specifically suited for the demands of trial preparation and courtroom advocacy:

  1. Accurate Transcription: High-quality transcription forms the foundation of this approach. Rev's AI-powered transcription achieves 95%+ accuracy even with multiple speakers and challenging audio environments, ensuring attorneys can rely on the text as a true representation of what was said. For critical testimony, human-verified transcription options can push accuracy to 99%, providing court-ready documentation that can stand up to scrutiny.
  2. Multi-File Insights: Perhaps most transformative for criminal defense work is the ability to search across multiple documents simultaneously. Rather than reviewing each interview separately, attorneys can immediately identify contradictions across different statements made by the same witness at different times. This capability allows for comprehensive pattern recognition that would be virtually impossible with manual methods.
  3. AI Assistant: Real-time searching capabilities powered by AI help attorneys instantly locate relevant statements even during the pressure of trial. As Adam Levin experienced, this means being able to verify contradictions the moment they occur in testimony. The AI can understand contextual questions and AI prompts about the content, helping attorneys quickly find relevant sections without needing to remember exact phrasing or timestamps.
  4. Synchronized Audio/Video: Direct integration of transcripts with the original recordings enables immediate playback of contradictory statements—a powerful tool for impeachment. When a witness denies making a statement, attorneys can instantly play the exact audio while displaying the transcript, creating a compelling moment of impeachment that can significantly impact juror perceptions.
  5. Searchability: Full-text search capabilities mean attorneys can instantly locate specific topics, phrases, or details across hundreds of pages of testimony. Advanced features allow searching by speaker, time period, or specific terminology relevant to the case. Additionally, annotation capabilities enable attorneys to mark key statements, add notes, and create a roadmap for cross-examination that integrates seamlessly with the transcript.
  6. Legal-Specific AI Templates: Specialized AI templates designed specifically for legal workflows help identify potentially impeachable statements, track timeline inconsistencies, and flag testimony that contradicts physical evidence. These templates can quickly process hours of testimony and highlight the most promising areas for cross-examination focus.

Implementation Guide for Criminal Defense Attorneys

For criminal defense attorneys looking to implement similar capabilities, consider the following steps:

  1. Choose a Speech Tech Partner: Find a solution that you can trust. Look for accurate transcription, legal-specific AI, and easy organization.
  2. Identify Critical Recordings: Prioritize transcription of interviews, preliminary hearings, and depositions most likely to contain important testimony.
  3. Establish Organization Systems: Create consistent file naming conventions and organization structures to maximize searchability.
  4. Train on Real-Time Tools: Practice using search and AI assistant features before trial to ensure comfort with the technology under pressure.
  5. Prepare Technical Setup: Ensure courtroom setup allows for seamless access to digital tools, including considerations for power, internet access, and device positioning.
  6. Develop Backup Plans: Even with technology, maintain backup methods for accessing critical information in case of technical difficulties.

Next Steps for Speech Tech Implementation

The integration of advanced speech technology into criminal defense represents a significant evolution in how attorneys prepare for and conduct cross-examinations. By transforming hours of recorded statements into searchable, accessible text—and providing tools to instantly locate and present contradictions—these technologies enable a level of preparation and responsiveness previously impossible.

For firms like Swingle Levin, the impact goes beyond mere efficiency. As Adam Levin summarized their experience: "Rev is a very cool product for trial lawyers."

As these technologies continue to evolve, they promise to further transform criminal defense practice, empowering attorneys to build stronger cases and more effectively advocate for their clients in the courtroom. Ready to give it a try? Check out Rev’s solutions for lawyers.

Hungry For More?

Luckily for you, we deliver. Subscribe to our blog today.

Thank You for Subscribing!

A confirmation email is on it’s way to your inbox.

Share this post
The LinkedIn logo in black.
The Facebook logo in black.
X logo
The Pinterest logo in black.
A icon of a piece of mail in black.

Subscribe to The Rev Blog

Sign up to get Rev content delivered straight to your inbox.