Aug 4, 2020

Nancy Pelosi PBS Interview Transcript August 4: Talks COVID-19 Response

Nancy Pelosi PBS Interview Transcript August 4: Talks COVID-19 Response
RevBlogTranscriptsNancy Pelosi TranscriptsNancy Pelosi PBS Interview Transcript August 4: Talks COVID-19 Response

Nancy Pelosi was interviewed on PBS about the coronavirus relief bill on August 4. She said: “Children are food insecure by the millions, and they don’t want to spend the money necessary to feed the children,” when talking about negotiations with Republicans. Read the transcript of her interview here.

Transcribe Your Own Content

Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling.

Judy Woodruff: (00:00)
To give us a sense of where things stand I’m joined by the Democrat’s top negotiator. She is the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. Madam Speaker, welcome back to The News Hour. So in brief, where do things stand? We just heard that Secretary Mnuchin is saying you’re aiming for a deal this week. What does it look like from your perspective?

Nancy Pelosi: (00:20)
Well, Leader Schumer and I said at our earlier availability with the press that we all have agreed that we need to have an agreement. And we have to have an agreement though, that faces the reality of the situation. We do believe that the White House has not really accepted the gravity of the situation. And that’s why they’re thinking in smaller ways than they need to. We have a situation where we’re trying to save the lives, the livelihood, and the life of our democracy. We are making some progress. We are understanding each other better, exchanging paper to see in writing. Chuck Schumer and I, leader Schumer and I, are legislators for many years. We understand when we have a challenge to face and we want to have a legislative solution, we have to know what we’re talking about. And that’s why we have to be precise about what we say and the impact it has. And really we have-

Judy Woodruff: (01:17)
So are you-

Nancy Pelosi: (01:17)
Different point of view than the Republicans on this.

Judy Woodruff: (01:21)
So are you coming closer together on that all important unemployment, federal unemployment benefits number? Democrats were asking for $600 a week to continue. Republicans were saying $200. Are you somewhere in between? We were told maybe you’re-

Nancy Pelosi: (01:37)
There’s no in between. The fact is that since we passed our bill, which was 11 weeks ago tomorrow, 3.3 million more people have gone on to the infected list of those infected. 70,000 more people have died and the Republicans said they were going to push the pause button and they did. And then last week they came up with some piecemeal thing. We are not saying to the American people, “More people are infected, more people are dying, more people are uninsured, more children are hunger insecure, food insecure. And guess what? We’re going to cut your benefit.”

Judy Woodruff: (02:18)
Well, Madam Speaker, I mean with all due respect, you called it piecemeal, and yet what the Republicans were offering was a short-term extension that would have allowed these extra unemployment benefits to keep flowing. Democrats said, “No.”

Nancy Pelosi: (02:33)
Well, they would have been finished by now. Actually, the fact is they didn’t have anything that they could pass in the Senate on their own side. So if the press wants to say, “Well, they offered this, they offered that,” you can’t offer something you don’t have. We have a bill. It’s called the HEROES Act. It passed 11 weeks ago tomorrow. It would have saved lives. They have nothing. They’ve said we have 20 members who won’t vote for anything. So what we’re talking rhetoric or we talking reality about what one side or the other is offering. And if they wanted to offer some piecemeal thing for one week, you only do that when you’re on the verge of closing of passing a bill and having it signed into law, otherwise it’s just showbiz.

Judy Woodruff: (03:23)
So I’m trying to understand where the two sides are coming together. For example, the Republican argument is that the $1,200 they would give to millions of Americans who need help right now would make up for some of that lesser amount in unemployment-

Nancy Pelosi: (03:43)
No, that’s exactly what we had in the CARES Act. We had the $1,200 in the CARES Act and we had the $600 in the CARES Act. So how does that make up for subtracting something? That doesn’t even make sense on their part. I mean, really, we have to get something done. We have to get something done. This is the gravity of the situation. We want to honor our heroes by supporting state and local government. We want to end this virus by having testing, tracing, treating. They said testing is overrated. Tracing, they don’t even believe in. And we want to put money in the pockets of the American people.

Nancy Pelosi: (04:20)
We also have some other things we want to do to protect our democracy, with voting, to protect the post office and what that means to our country, that strong OSHA law, and to feed our children. So these are largely our priorities. And what they’re saying is, “Well, we can’t afford to do that.” Well, let’s find out what we can afford. What is the figure that we can agree to? Let’s get it done as soon as we can so that we can get it out there, but let’s not-

Judy Woodruff: (04:47)
what about-

Nancy Pelosi: (04:48)
Be misrepresenting about what we’re presenting.

Judy Woodruff: (04:51)
Excuse me for interrupting. What about with regard to food aid?

Nancy Pelosi: (04:55)

Judy Woodruff: (04:56)
Democrats do have money in the HEROES Act proposal for food. Republicans don’t. But when I talked to leader McConnell last week, he said the money they have in there that goes to schools would provide at least school meals for children. So, that would make up a significant portion of the food assistance that Democrats are talking about.

Nancy Pelosi: (05:21)
Let me tell you this, in our bill, we have $67 billion for food, and then a small percentage of that was called food and utility. Food, utilities, water, like that. $67 billion, over 60 billion of it is for food. In their bill, they have $250,000 for food.

Judy Woodruff: (05:48)
And his point was that the money that they have for schools would pay for school meals for many children. And in his word-

Nancy Pelosi: (05:56)
But we have to do that anyway. We have to do that anyway. We have to do that anyway. So, I mean, we’re far apart in terms of our values, quite frankly. We’re far apart in understanding the gravity of the situation. Are we determined to find an agreement? Yes. We will find our common ground, but we won’t find it on the slim read of a piecemeal bill that says to our workers, “You used to get 600, you’re now going to get 200 because the virus has intensified in its spread.”

Judy Woodruff: (06:32)
The other point Republicans are making is they are now showing flexibility in money for state and local governments. This is again, a difference. Democrats want more money. Republicans want a lot less. They are saying they’re willing to show flexibility. And they’re also saying a lot of the money that was passed in the spring, Madam Speaker, has not even been spent yet.

Nancy Pelosi: (06:52)
Well, if you want to be an advocate for them, Judy. If you want to be an advocate for them-

Judy Woodruff: (06:56)
No, I’m-

Nancy Pelosi: (06:56)
Let’s know what the facts are.

Judy Woodruff: (06:57)
I’m playing devil’s advocate here-

Nancy Pelosi: (06:59)
No you aren’t.

Judy Woodruff: (06:59)
To ask you for your position.

Nancy Pelosi: (07:02)
The point is we have a bill that meets the needs of the American people. It’s called the HEROES Act. They don’t even want to do state and local. And when they do, it’s very meager and they want to revert some money from before. Much of the money that was allocated before has been spent or allocated. A small amount has not because they’d want to see what we’re doing in this bill. But that approach is no reason for us not to recognize. We have $915 billion for states, localities, counties and the rest, tribal governments and territories. They have very little money that they’re offering.

Nancy Pelosi: (07:53)
When we have a chance, and when we’re allowed to show you what the different numbers are, but our record is clear. Our record is clear. We’re there for America’s working families, we’re concerned that tens of millions of people have gone on the 19th straight month of people going on to unemployment insurance. 19th straight week of over 1 million people going on unemployment insurance. Children are food insecure by the millions, and they don’t want to spend the money necessary to feed the children. Families are in fear of eviction. And they said, “Well, we’ll extend the moratorium, but we won’t put any money to help with that rent. And in terms of the $600, we’re going to cut your benefit. And that’s how we’re going to observe this.” Now, again, we’ll find our common ground, but I don’t think in any way as a legislator, that what they are proposing has any recognition of what is happening to the lives, the livelihood and the life of our democracy.

Judy Woodruff: (09:01)
Yeah. So what I was asking about was money that had already been appropriated that hadn’t been spent, and whether that could be part of any solution.

Nancy Pelosi: (09:09)
No. That’s money from before. And as I said, their contention that hasn’t been spent, it’s been allocated and there’s a small amount that they’re waiting to see what we do here before they release.

Judy Woodruff: (09:22)
And again, trying to understand where the two sides may be coming together. As you know, they argue spending so much money. The Democrat’s $3 trillion is going to put the country into greater red ink that that hurts future generations.

Nancy Pelosi: (09:38)
They didn’t seem to mind when they gave a big gigantic tax cut that added $2 trillion to the national debt so they could give 83% of the benefits to the top 1%. It’s amazing how free and clear of the national debt they are when it comes to their rich friends and how exacting they are when a poor person who’s out of work gets $600.

Judy Woodruff: (10:02)
So is there any conversation about rolling back any of those tax cuts?

Nancy Pelosi: (10:07)
We’re not doing that in this bill. Well, there’s one we would like to roll back. In the CARES Act, they put $150 billion for wealthy people in our country having nothing to do with coronavirus, and it was retroactive for their taxes in the past. We’d like to get rid of that. I don’t think we’ll have that chance. But when we address the issue of taxation in our country, we will do that in a way that is bipartisan, has sustainability, fairness, and transparency, so the American people can see what is happening rather than in the dark of night and the speed of light, a bill that gives 83% of the benefits to the top 1% and adds nearly $2 trillion to the national debt for our children to pay. And then to come around to us and say, “How can we do all this money for food stamps? It’s going to add to the national debt.”

Nancy Pelosi: (10:57)
So we have a big difference here. So when you’re putting forth, with all due respect to you as you respected me, their piecemeal, meager approach that doesn’t even recognize the gravity of the situation. If they had recognized it, we wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in. Since our bill passed 11 weeks ago tomorrow, 3.3 million people again have gone on to the list of those infected, 70 million have died. That didn’t have to happen.

Judy Woodruff: (11:28)
But bottom line, are you saying there could be a deal reached this week, legislation passed next week?

Nancy Pelosi: (11:34)
I hope that.

Judy Woodruff: (11:35)
Is that a possibility?

Nancy Pelosi: (11:35)
That would be the plan. Yes. In other words, our differences are again in our value systems. So in terms of this legislation, and Chuck and I are master legislators, we’ve been here a long time, know how to get bills done. We know the devil and the angels are in the details. That’s why we’re exchanging papers to see what they actually mean and intend to do rather than a conversation.

Nancy Pelosi: (11:59)
But we have to have an agreement and we will have an agreement, but we’re not going to do it at the expense of America’s working families on the basis that it’s going to add to the national debt. Everybody, and that’s chairman of fed, others have said if we don’t help now with the economy and stop the spread of this virus, the economic situation is only going to worse. Worsen. So not investing in making it safe for our children to go to school or people to go to work, the people we’re giving this money to, to inject demand into the economy so that the economy thrives, it’s only going to make matters worse.

Nancy Pelosi: (12:45)
So again, we feel very proudful of the work that was done by our chairman to bring us to this place, to help again, I say it again, save the lives, the livelihood, and the life of our democracy.

Judy Woodruff: (13:03)
House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi. We thank you very much for joining us.

Nancy Pelosi: (13:06)
Thank you, Judy. Thank you so much. Thank you.

Transcribe Your Own Content

Try Rev and save time transcribing, captioning, and subtitling.